WALL STREET’S MOST INFLUENTIAL CEOs HAVE OBAMA’S TREASURY SECRETARY ON SPEED DIAL, AND IT PAYS.

by ROBERT SCHEER
from HUSTLER Magazine – January 2010

Then Timothy Geithner headed the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, he was very good at mealtime, particularly with the Wall Street fat cats he was supposed to be governing. The details of his endless private dining with the likes of Sanford Weill, Robert Rubin and other big bankers responsible for the economic meltdown only came out after President Obama named him Treasury Secretary—and in response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit.

“An examination of Mr. Geithner’s five years as president of the New York Fed, an era of unbridled and ultimately disastrous risk-taking by the financial industry, shows that he forged unusually close relationships with executives of Wall Street’s giant financial institutions,” the New York Times reported. “His actions, as a regulator and later a bailout king, often aligned with the industry’s interests and desires, according to interviews with financiers, regulators and analysts and a review of Federal Reserve records.”

You would have thought that the embarrassing disclosures of how tight this guy was with the banking bandits would have led him to change his social habits—and it has: Instead of private dining encounters, he now schmoozes the bankers during incessant phone calls. Of course, we only learned this when the Wall Street Journal and other news organizations forced the information public through another FOIA lawsuit.

Under the headline “Wall Street on Geithner’s Speed Dial,” the WSJ reported that “Geithner has kept frequent contact with an exclusive group of Wall Street executives since taking the helm at Treasury, speaking most often with top officials from Goldman Sachs Group Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase Co., CitiGroup Inc. and BlackRock Inc.” And, in fact, he logged far more time talking with Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Sachs, than he did with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, the two leaders of Congress to whom he was supposed to be reporting.

The bigger concern is not the frequency of Geithner’s calls, however, but which end of the call is setting the tone. Representative Brad Sherman (D-California), who has been pushing for tougher regulation of financial institutions, complained: “I don’t mind that he’s talking to Wall Street. The problem is that he appears to be listening.”

Blankfein’s Goldman Sachs bears as much responsibility for the banking meltdown as any other firm and was one of the main beneficiaries of the government’s subsequent heaving of trillions into the gullets of culpable financial institutions that had gambled themselves to the brink of bankruptcy.

Remember, it was former Goldman head Robert Rubin who, as treasury secretary in the Clinton Administration, had pushed through the radical deregulation that allowed Wall Street to spin out of control. And it was another Goldman honcho, Henry Paulson, who served as treasury secretary to George W. Bush and ignored the ballooning problem, then led the government bailout that saved the very companies, like Goldman, that deserved to fail.

Thanks to Paulson, Goldman was allowed to reconstitute itself as a commercial bank and therefore became eligible for $10 billion in TARP bailout funds, as well as massive additional support from the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve. But the daisy chain doesn’t end there.

After leaving the government, Rubin became a top leader of Citigroup, a company allowed to grow too big to fail by the deregulation he had pushed through. He made over $100 million looking the other way while Citigroup sank close to the point of oblivion. It was prevented from total collapse when Geithner, a Rubin protégé in the Treasury Department who had become New York Fed chairman thanks to Rubin’s influence—joined Paulson in bailing out Citigroup. The bank was given $45 billion outright and a federal guarantee for $300 billion of its toxic assets.

Treasury Secretary Geithner, who took office in January 2009, had frequent phone conversations with the leaders of Citigroup, which might be acceptable if he had gained some concessions on its part. Instead, Citigroup was actively lobbying against any serious efforts to rein in this and other highflying banks. Even though we taxpayers are supposed to own 34% of Citigroup, there is no evidence that this has translated into making the bank’s policies more transparent or accountable.

In contrast, Geithner did not care to hear from the executives of the auto companies that were being saved, at far lower cost, from disaster. As the Wall Street Journal reported, “Mr. Geithner appears to have had no contact with officials at General Motors Co. and just one call with a Chrysler Group LLC official.” Apparently the grittier types in Detroit don’t rate solicitous calls from Wall Street CEOs’ obedient lackey, Obama appointee Timothy Geithner.

——————————————

Before serving 30 years as a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, Robert Scheer spent the late 1960s as Vietnam correspondent, managing editor and editor in chief of Ramparts magazine. Now editor of TruthDig.com, Scheer has written such hard-hitting books as The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America and his latest, The Great American Stick-Up: Greedy Bankers and the Politicians Who Love Them.

———————————–

You may purchase the hard copy of the January 2010 Issue of HUSTLER Magazine (with free shipping) at HustlerMagazine.com for $15.99 and free shipping. Comes with free full length DVD!

You may purchase a digital copy of the January 2010 Issue of HUSTLER Magazine at UnderCoverMags.com.

THE CIA’s “FAMILY JEWELS” SHOULD ENLIGHTEN SELF-RIGHTEOUS AMERICANS.

Among the many possible theories for why George W. Bush wanted so badly to rush into Iraq in 2003, one of the most popular was that “Saddam tried to kill his daddy.” Or, as the satirical newspaper The Onion put it in a garish, fake action-movie poster with Dubya as an ersatz Rambo: Gulf War II—The Vengeance.

The alleged Hussein-sponsored attempt to assassinate the first President Bush a decade earlier was blithely offered around water coolers and barbecues as a handy debate stopper. Oil? Too greedy. WMDs? Too complicated. 9/11? No Osama. Revenge? Nice.

Conveniently forgotten was our own rich history of attempting to assassinate foreign leaders with whom we took umbrage. This summer, however, the American public received—from an unlikely source—a public- service reminder that our own Cold War shenanigans, including such murder plots, often provided a blueprint for the Saddam Husseins of the world, rather than a rebuke.

Belatedly responding to a 1992 Freedom of Information Request, the CIA released the so-called Family Jewels—a 700-plus-page collection of memos and other documents generated in-house in 1973 in order to prep the agency’s chieftains on potentially embarrassing and/or illegal actions that might be uncovered by the aggressive journalistic and Congressional investigations then being spawned by Watergate.

While most of its meatiest revelations were originally exposed by the Senate’s Church Committee and various muckraking reporters like Jack Anderson and Seymour Hersh, the Family Jewels provides confirmation of some and disturbing new details on others—while also hinting at possible crimes only guessed at previously. (Perhaps most intriguing is that the document’s very first revelation is completely redacted; what could be so disturbing as to deserve such blanket censorship at this late date?) Some of the highlights we can now read include details on various CIA activities:

● Forceful attempts to assassinate foreign leaders, specifically Fidel Castro (before he had allied with the Soviet Union), through the auspices of the Mafia, and anticolonialist Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba of the Congo with poison created and delivered by the agency’s real-life version of James Bond’s gadget master. Stalled only by the Bay of Pigs debacle, the Kennedy Administration authorized Castro kill schemes based on the deployment of FBI Most Wanted mobsters with longtime ties to Cuba’s corrupt Batista dictatorship that a popular revolution had just overthrown. In other words—as in Guatemala in 1953, Iran in 1954, South Vietnam in 1963, Chile in 1973 and numerous other non-Communist countries during the Cold War—the CIA employed despicable means to engineer the accession of right-wing dictators.

● Domestic spying activities, which are explicitly banned by the CIA’s 1947 charter to prevent it from becoming a Gestapo-style secret police agency. In particular, the documents detail the spying on journalists reporting on CIA activities, as well as anti- Vietnam War organizations. Mail was opened, phones were tapped, and reporters’ offices were staked out.

● Creepy drug-testing programs performed on ill-informed or unwitting subjects designed to discover new mind-control techniques. One program tested drugs deemed unsafe by the FDA on military personnel, while another foisted LSD on the unsuspecting to see if the hallucinogen could be an effective truth serum.

● Harsh treatment of a Soviet secret agent who defected to the U.S. and was suspected by the agency of being a plant to mislead America. The defector was secretly held in solitary confinement and interrogated for several years before finally being believed, an “off-the-books” imprisonment that presaged on a small scale the torture gulag the CIA is reportedly running as part of the so-called War on Terror.

Unfortunately, while transparency about the past provides something of a corrective to the convenient whitewashing of our nation’s history, it would be much more effective if applied to our current leaders’ trouncing of our democratic ideals and systems. It is surreal, in fact, to hear a Bush- Cheney Administration—infamous for its pathological devotion to secrecy—releasing the Family Jewels in honor of the “social contract with the American people,” in the words of CIA Director Michael Hayden. That’s like Barry Bonds turning over Mark McGwire’s steroid needles in order to preserve the sanctity of baseball.

Actually, when the story is fully told, the Bush-Cheney years will likely make the lies and crimes of their predecessors seem mild in comparison—especially when one considers that our current enemies are so much less threatening or powerful. Yet at a time when our leaders cite a single lucky attack as the rationale for all manner of crazy military adventures (is Iran next?) and civil-rights outrages, it is ever important to cut through the self-righteousness of U.S. posturing as the world’s avenging angel. As a nation, the Family Jewels remind us, we have been quite willing to terrorize others.